Project Overview
The engagement was designed to identify and remediate gaps before the scheduled FDIC examination, with a focus on transaction monitoring effectiveness and control testing.
The Challenge
The bank's internal audit function lacked specialized BSA/AML expertise, and the compliance team was uncertain about their readiness for regulatory scrutiny.
Pre-Exam Concerns
- Transaction monitoring thresholds not validated
- Look-back testing not performed
- CTR/SAR filing procedures outdated
Operational Gaps
- High-risk customer reviews backlogged
- Beneficial ownership records incomplete
- Board reporting lacked key metrics
The Strategy
We executed a risk-based assessment prioritizing areas most likely to draw regulatory attention:
Model Validation
Tested transaction monitoring system thresholds and rules against actual transaction patterns to identify calibration issues.
Transaction Testing
- SAR narrative quality assessment
Customer Due Diligence
- Beneficial ownership verification
- Enhanced due diligence adequacy
- Risk rating methodology review
Results
Zero regulatory findings at examination 47 controls tested and validated 12 policies updated to current standards High-risk customer backlog eliminated Enhanced board reporting with key risk indicatorsKey Takeaway
Community banks face the same regulatory expectations as large institutions but often lack specialized compliance resources. Independent testing provides objective assurance and identifies gaps before they become examination findings or enforcement actions.