An AML review is approaching: what leadership should focus on

Understand the purpose and audience

Founders and leadership teams may encounter an examination, an independent review or a partner assessment. These are not interchangeable. Establish the purpose of the exercise before deciding what support you need, and avoid assuming that a preparation engagement is itself an independent audit.

Make the business understandable

The review should reflect how the operation actually works. A disconnect between policies and day-to-day decisions is a leadership concern, even when the paperwork looks complete. Be candid about changes and unresolved issues; preparation should improve understanding rather than make weaknesses less visible.

Prepare to make decisions afterwards

Findings can require management attention, resources and changes in responsibility. A report alone does not resolve them. An adviser can help leadership understand priorities and agree a practical response, with separate independence arrangements where later testing is required.

Separate evidence gaps from operating gaps

An evidence gap means the company cannot readily show what happened. An operating gap means the intended work did not happen or did not work as expected. Both matter, but organizing files cannot repair an activity that was never performed.

Before a review, leadership should understand which type of gap is being discussed. Be candid about known weaknesses and the work underway to address them. A clear explanation of the current position is more useful than a presentation that implies everything is complete. After the review, assign ownership for the response and keep management informed about unresolved issues.

Questions for founders

• What is the reviewer being asked to assess?
• Can our team explain how the operation works today?
• Who has authority to address the findings?

Related perspectives